> Hi, > > On Mon, Nov 14 2011, Per Forlin wrote: >> If max_seg_size is unaligned, mmc_test_map_sg() may create sg element >> sizes that are not aligned with 512 byte. Fix, align max_seg_size at >> mmc_test_area_init(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin <per.forlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c | 1 + >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c >> index b038c4a..5848998 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/card/mmc_test.c >> @@ -1581,6 +1581,7 @@ static int mmc_test_area_init(struct mmc_test_card >> *test, int erase, int fill) >> >> t->max_segs = test->card->host->max_segs; >> t->max_seg_sz = test->card->host->max_seg_size; >> + t->max_seg_sz -= t->max_seg_sz % 512; >> >> t->max_tfr = t->max_sz; >> if (t->max_tfr >> 9 > test->card->host->max_blk_count) > > Thanks, pushed to mmc-next for 3.2. (Sujit, please let us know if you > still have worries about aligning to host->max_blk_size.) No issues. The change looks good. -- Thanks, Sujit -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
