On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:56:44PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:27:27AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 05:05:47PM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
> > > > {
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > ret = clk_prepare(clk);
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > return ret;
> > > > ret = clk_enable(clk);
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > clk_unprepare(clk);
> > > > return ret;
> > >
> > > Yes, looks good.
> >
> > While this looks like a nice easy solution for converting existing
> > drivers, I'd suggest thinking about this a little more...
> >
> > I would suggest some thought is given to the placement of clk_enable()
> > and clk_disable() when adding clk_prepare(), especially if your existing
> > clk_enable() function can only be called from non-atomic contexts.
> >
> > Obviously, the transition path needs to be along these lines:
> >
> > 1. add clk_prepare() to drivers
> > 2. implement clk_prepare() and make clk_enable() callable from non-atomic
> > contexts
> > 3. move clk_enable() in drivers to places it can be called from non-atomic
> > contexts to achieve greater power savings (maybe via the runtime pm)
Hi Russell,
There are use cases calling clk_enable in atomic context, but there are even more
cases caling in non-atomic context. The patch meant to help the latter cases.
Tuning of driver power savings can be left to other contributers. Is it ok
if I add below comments:
/* clk_prepare_enable helps cases using clk_enable in non-atomic context. */
static inline int clk_prepare_enable(struct clk *clk)
...
/* clk_disable_unprepare helps cases using clk_disable in non-atomic context. */
static inline void clk_disable_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
...
Thanks
Richard
> >
> > and where a driver is shared between different sub-architectures which
> > have non-atomic clk_enable()s, (3) can only happen when all those sub-
> > architectures have been updated to step (2).
>
> The drivers changed here all do clk_prepare/enable in their probe
> function. I agree that this clk_prepare_enable patch gives kind of
> wrong motivation to just use this function and to forget about
> potential power savings with proper integration of clk_prepare/enable.
> I think though that it will take a long time until all drivers really
> do this no matter if we have such a helper or not. I think that in the
> meantime it's better to have a little helper than to clobber the probe
> code with additional error handling.
>
> Sascha
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
