On 24/10/11 12:56, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:54:00AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux >> <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 02:31:39AM +0200, Sebastian Rasmussen wrote: >>>> I guess the patch would appeal more to Russell if mmci_runtime_suspend() >>>> only cleared MCIMask0/SDI_MASK0 and MCIClock/SDI_CLKCR and left >>>> MCIPower/SDI_PWR unchanged. It may be the case that the signal direction >>>> bits need to be cleared for the ST-Ericsson PL180, but I haven't yet verified >>>> this on my Snowball dev board yet. >>> >>> There's also the issue that the specs call for the clock to run after >>> a command has completed for a certain number of cycles, and that the >>> clock must continue to run until the card reports not-busy after a >>> programming or erase cycle has completed - that can be long after the >>> previous command has 'completed'. >> >> It's 8 cycles on MCLK required. > > _Plus_ keeping the clock running while the card is signalling busy. > > If you don't clock the card while its signalling busy, it will never > go non-busy (the data line becomes frozen.) The spec does say that it is OK to turn off the clock, but it must be turned back on to release the busy signal. That will always happen with the block driver because it always sends a status command when waiting. Maybe it is an issue with SDIO but currently SDIO is using MMC_QUIRK_BROKEN_CLK_GATING by default (although wl1271 is using it) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
