Re: [PATCH] sdhci: expose the SDCLK frq in sys ios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/10/11 09:31, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> Hello Adrian
> 
> On 10/20/2011 8:22 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 19/10/11 16:45, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
>>> This patch is to expose the SDCLK frequency in the ios /sys entry.
>>>
>>> For example, if the max clk for a normal speed card is 20MHz
>>> this will be reported in /sys/kernel/debug/mmc0/ios instead of
>>> the real SDCLK frequency (calculated as Baseclock / divisor;
>>> divisor used for programming the Clock Control Register).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@xxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c |    9 ++++++++-
>>>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>> index 0e02cc1..6bdf64f 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
>>> @@ -1045,6 +1045,7 @@ static void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>>  	int div = 0; /* Initialized for compiler warning */
>>>  	u16 clk = 0;
>>>  	unsigned long timeout;
>>> +	unsigned int new_hc_clock = host->max_clk;
>>>  
>>>  	if (clock == host->clock)
>>>  		return;
>>> @@ -1134,7 +1135,10 @@ static void sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>>  	sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>>>  
>>>  out:
>>> -	host->clock = clock;
>>> +	if (div)
>>> +		new_hc_clock = host->max_clk / div;
>>
>> At this point div is the value written to the register not the
>> divisor
> 
> Hmm, you are right. I'll fix it.
> 
>>> +
>>> +	host->clock = new_hc_clock;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>  static void sdhci_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned short power)
>>> @@ -1293,6 +1297,9 @@ static void sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
>>>  
>>>  	sdhci_set_clock(host, ios->clock);
>>>  
>>> +	/* Clock provided to the HC */
>>> +	ios->clock = host->clock;
>>
>> It would be nicer to keep ios->clock as the target
>> frequency and add a new member to struct mmc_host for
>> the actual frequency.
> 
> Why not! I like it. I'll rework the patch and send it again.
> Just a question: do I have to dump both in /sys/.../ios?
> If yes, maybe it's worth using: card_clock and hc_clock as names.
> What do you think?

For me hc_clock is confusing.  Potentially the host controller has
lots of clocks e.g. interface clock, functional clock, debounce clock

Also, I would not rename anything.  You could add

	/sys/kernel/debug/mmcx/actual_clock

or amend /sys/kernel/debug/mmcx/ios e.g.

clock:          26000000 Hz (actual 25000000 Hz)
vdd:            17 (2.9 ~ 3.0 V)
bus mode:       2 (push-pull)
chip select:    0 (don't care)
power mode:     2 (on)
bus width:      2 (4 bits)
timing spec:    0 (legacy)



> 
> Regards
> Peppe
> 
>>
>>> +
>>>  	if (ios->power_mode == MMC_POWER_OFF)
>>>  		sdhci_set_power(host, -1);
>>>  	else
>>
>>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux