On 05/10/11 18:33, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
Hi,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Namjae Jeon"<linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
To: cjb@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, awarkentin@xxxxxxxxxx, "adrian hunter"<adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>, "linus walleij"
<linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>, "james p freyensee"<james_p_freyensee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, sebras@xxxxxxxxx, "Ulf Hansson"
<Ulf.Hansson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "stefan xk nilsson"<stefan.xk.nilsson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "per forlin"
<per.forlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "johan rudholm"<johan.rudholm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Namjae Jeon"<linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2011 10:45:45 AM
Subject: [PATCH v11] mmc : general purpose partition support.
It allows gerneral purpose partitions in MMC Device.
And I try to simpliy make mmc_blk_alloc_parts using mmc_part
structure suggested by Andrei Warkentin.
After patching, we can see general purpose partitions like this.
cat /proc/partitions
179 0 847872 mmcblk0
179 192 4096 mmcblk0gp3
179 160 4096 mmcblk0gp2
179 128 4096 mmcblk0gp1
179 96 1052672 mmcblk0gp0
179 64 1024 mmcblk0boot1
179 32 1024 mmcblk0boot0
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon<linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 52
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/mmc/card.h | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 5 +++-
4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+ for (idx = 0; idx< card->nr_parts; idx++) {
+ if (mmc_is_boot_partition(&card->part[idx])&&
+ !mmc_boot_partition_access(card->host))
+ continue;
+ if (card->part[idx].size) {
+ ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
+ card->part[idx].part_cfg,
+ card->part[idx].size>> 9,
+ card->part[idx].force_ro,
+ card->part[idx].name);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
}
Is there any reason for putting the mmc_boot_partition_access() logic here? If
boot partitions are not allowed by host, then just don't add the mmc_parts to
the parts array, no? Such minutae should belong in core mmc code, not block driver, IMHO.
I like data structures to model reality i.e. the partitions exist but are not
accessible. However I am not fussed - change it or not.
A
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html