Hi James. > Can I suggest that instead of having 6 new macros with offset parameters > from the reg parameter (after all, the caller can just add the offset to > the reg argument just as easily), you simply store the data register > offset (what is currently DATA+host->data_offset) instead of > host->data_offset, and use that instead of DATA. That would be simpler > and more readable. Sure..i understood your suggestion. But i think that need check the version-id. i will also consider more..:) > > DATA should probably be defined as the most up to date value, and define > another one for pre-240A versions. Right. i wonder why changed the DATA register :( Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
