On 09/22/2011 04:58 PM, NamJae Jeon wrote:
2011/9/23 J Freyensee<james_p_freyensee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 09/22/2011 04:15 PM, NamJae Jeon wrote:
2011/9/23 J Freyensee<james_p_freyensee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On 09/22/2011 08:34 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
It allows general purpose parition in MMC Device. If it is enable, it
will
make mmcblk0gp1,gp2,gp3,gp4 partition like this.
cat /proc/paritition
179 0 847872 mmcblk0
179 192 4096 mmcblk0gp4
179 160 4096 mmcblk0gp3
179 128 4096 mmcblk0gp2
179 96 1052672 mmcblk0gp1
179 64 1024 mmcblk0boot1
179 32 1024 mmcblk0boot0
Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon<linkinjeon@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c | 42
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/mmc/card.h | 4 ++++
include/linux/mmc/mmc.h | 4 ++++
4 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
index 9b90726..074ec55 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/card/block.c
@@ -1402,6 +1402,42 @@ static int mmc_blk_alloc_parts(struct mmc_card
*card, struct mmc_blk_data *md)
return ret;
}
+ if (card->ext_csd.gp1_size) {
+ ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP1,
+ card->ext_csd.gp1_size>> 9,
+ false,
+ "gp1");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
if mmc_blk_alloc_part() fails for 'if (card->ext_csd.pt1_size)', why
would
you want to give this code the opportunity to call mmc_blk_alloc_part()
again with the next if() below? If mmc_blk_alloc_part() fails, is it a
big
problem, like kzalloc() failing? If so, I would think you would want to
immediately quit this function and report an error (either use errno
value
or pass the value of ret).
-> if card->ext_csd.gp1_size is no zero, it means general purpose
partition is enable.
and it can set up to 4 partition in specification. so we should check
it by next if().
Please document that in your code. Please add a function header to this
function.
I will add comments at this code. I don't understand why a function
header should be added yet.
One or the other.
but a function comment header should be added at some point. Yes, the
mmc subsystem is pretty legacy, but any new work that gets added to the
kernel is usually has higher standards for stuff like not just adding
function header comments but putting them in a certain format...at least
this is what I went through when I had things accepted upstream.
+ if (card->ext_csd.gp2_size) {
+ ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP2,
+ card->ext_csd.gp2_size>> 9,
+ false,
+ "gp2");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (card->ext_csd.gp3_size) {
+ ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP3,
+ card->ext_csd.gp3_size>> 9,
+ false,
+ "gp3");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (card->ext_csd.gp4_size) {
+ ret = mmc_blk_alloc_part(card, md,
EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP4,
+ card->ext_csd.gp4_size>> 9,
+ false,
+ "gp4");
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
return ret;
}
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index 10f5a19..cc31511 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -393,6 +393,48 @@ static int mmc_read_ext_csd(struct mmc_card *card,
u8
*ext_csd)
card->ext_csd.enhanced_area_offset = -EINVAL;
card->ext_csd.enhanced_area_size = -EINVAL;
}
+
+ /*
+ * General purpose partition Support
+ */
+
+ if (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_PARTITION_SUPPORT]& 0x1) {
+
+ u8 hc_erase_grp_sz =
+ ext_csd[EXT_CSD_HC_ERASE_GRP_SIZE];
+ u8 hc_wp_grp_sz =
+ ext_csd[EXT_CSD_HC_WP_GRP_SIZE];
+
+ card->ext_csd.enhanced_area_en = 1;
+
+ card->ext_csd.gp1_size =
+ (ext_csd[145]<< 16) + (ext_csd[144]<<
8)
+
+ ext_csd[143];
+ card->ext_csd.gp1_size *=
+ (size_t)(hc_erase_grp_sz *
hc_wp_grp_sz);
+ card->ext_csd.gp1_size<<= 19;
+
+ card->ext_csd.gp2_size =
+ (ext_csd[148]<< 16) + (ext_csd[147]<<
8)
+
+ ext_csd[146];
+ card->ext_csd.gp2_size *=
+ (size_t)(hc_erase_grp_sz *
hc_wp_grp_sz);
+ card->ext_csd.gp2_size<<= 19;
+
+ card->ext_csd.gp3_size =
+ (ext_csd[151]<< 16) + (ext_csd[150]<<
8)
+
+ ext_csd[149];
+ card->ext_csd.gp3_size *=
+ (size_t)(hc_erase_grp_sz *
hc_wp_grp_sz);
+ card->ext_csd.gp3_size<<= 19;
+
+ card->ext_csd.gp4_size =
+ (ext_csd[154]<< 16) + (ext_csd[153]<<
8)
+
+ ext_csd[152];
+ card->ext_csd.gp4_size *=
+ (size_t)(hc_erase_grp_sz *
hc_wp_grp_sz);
+ card->ext_csd.gp4_size<<= 19;
+ }
card->ext_csd.sec_trim_mult =
ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_TRIM_MULT];
card->ext_csd.sec_erase_mult =
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/card.h b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
index b460fc2..96a98a7 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/card.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/card.h
@@ -64,6 +64,10 @@ struct mmc_ext_csd {
unsigned long long enhanced_area_offset; /* Units: Byte */
unsigned int enhanced_area_size; /* Units: KB */
unsigned int boot_size; /* in bytes */
+ unsigned int gp1_size; /* in bytes */
+ unsigned int gp2_size; /* in bytes */
+ unsigned int gp3_size; /* in bytes */
+ unsigned int gp4_size; /* in bytes */
u8 raw_partition_support; /* 160 */
u8 raw_erased_mem_count; /* 181 */
u8 raw_ext_csd_structure; /* 194 */
diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
index 5a794cb..380720a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
+++ b/include/linux/mmc/mmc.h
@@ -303,6 +303,10 @@ struct _mmc_csd {
#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_MASK (0x7)
#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_BOOT0 (0x1)
#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_BOOT1 (0x2)
+#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP1 (0x4)
+#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP2 (0x5)
+#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP3 (0x6)
+#define EXT_CSD_PART_CONFIG_ACC_GP4 (0x7)
#define EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL (1<<0)
#define EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_SECURE (1<<1)
--
J (James/Jay) Freyensee
Storage Technology Group
Intel Corporation
--
J (James/Jay) Freyensee
Storage Technology Group
Intel Corporation
--
J (James/Jay) Freyensee
Storage Technology Group
Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
