> -----Original Message----- > From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 20:33 PM > To: Zang Roy-R61911 > Cc: cjb@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linuxppc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx; Xu Lei-B33228; Kumar Gala > Subject: Re: [PATCH] eSDHC: Access Freescale eSDHC registers by 32-bit > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 12:23:05PM +0000, Zang Roy-R61911 wrote: > > > > > Freescale eSDHC registers only support 32-bit accesses, > > > > this patch ensures that all Freescale eSDHC register accesses > > > > are 32-bit. > > > > > > So, what about the byte-swapping that Anton needed? You are simply > > > removing that if I am not mistaken. > > I do not see any comment for this patch from Anton. > > Maybe he is busy? Sounds fair. > > > You may miss the patch. Please confirm. > > I don't understand, what needs to be confirmed? Confirm: there is no comment about this patch. Previously, I sent this patch together with another one. But technically they are separated patches. I got some comments from Anton about the patch. I will try to address the comment. but for this one, it is a stand along patch. I'd like to push it first. > I am simply wondering > what happens to the byteswapping that Anton (back then) intentionally > implemented. I do not see any comment about byte swapping about this patch. you may have mis-understanding here. Roy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
