RE: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci-esdhc: Change delay after setting clock from 100ms to 1ms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2011 1:55 PM
> To: Lin Tony-B19295
> Cc: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> cjb@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci-esdhc: Change delay after setting
> clock from 100ms to 1ms
> 
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:51:15PM +0800, Tony Lin wrote:
> > 1ms is enough for hardware to change the clock to stable.
> > 100ms is too long.
> 
> How do you know that? Can you be sure for PowerPC as well? Have you
> researched why the original author of the code has chosen that value? If
> so, please update your commit message with such infos.
> 
I got this confirmation by IC simulation, but sorry I just noticed that's also used for PPC.
I can update the information after got confirmation from author. 

> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang
> |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/
> |

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux