Re: [PATCH 2/4] mmc: tmio: Provide separate interrupt handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Provide separate interrupt handlers which may be used by platforms where
> SDHI has three interrupt sources.
>
> This patch also removes the commented-out handling of CRC and other errors.
>
> Cc: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> Cc: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---

> +irqreturn_t tmio_mmc_irq(int irq, void *devid)
> +{
> +       struct tmio_mmc_host *host = devid;
> +       unsigned int ireg, status;
> +
> +       pr_debug("MMC IRQ begin\n");
> +
> +       tmio_mmc_card_irq_status(host, &ireg, &status);
> +       if (__tmio_mmc_card_detect_irq(host, ireg, status))
> +               return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +       if (__tmio_mmc_sdcard_irq(host, ireg, status))
> +               return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +
> +       tmio_mmc_sdio_irq(irq, devid);
>
> -out:
>        return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(tmio_mmc_irq);

Is there any particular reason for returning early in this interrupt
handler? By returning early I mean the "if ... return IRQ_HANDLED"
cases above.

I realize the old ISR code in the driver does just this, so if the
goal is to stay compatible then I guess we should keep this behavior.
>From my point of view it usually makes more sense to try to handle all
events that may be associated with the IRQ.

Thanks,

/ magnus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux