On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:40:17AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> Trying to go from IRQ to GPIO is not a good idea - most of the >> IRQ <-> GPIO macros we have today are just plain broken. Many of them >> just add or subtract a constant, which means non-GPIO IRQs have an >> apparant GPIO number too. Couple this with the fact that all positive >> GPIO numbers are valid, and this is a recipe for wrong GPIOs getting >> used and GPIOs being requested for non-GPIO IRQs. > > Yes, and there's a pile without these defined/ And I'm piling a few patches *deleting* irq_to_gpio() from platforms that define but actually don't use it, like U300 and SA1100. Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
