Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] mmc: core: add random fault injection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27 July 2011 18:08, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2011/7/27 Per Forlin <per.forlin@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> There is an issue with patch v4 now when fault_attr is per-host.
>> Without your patch the entry is still created at the root but there
>> are many instances of fault-attr. I think it's better to wait for your
>> patch to make it into the mmc-next tree before submitting my patch. I
>> will prepare a patch v5 that depends on your upcoming changes in
>> fault-inject with a note that states the dependency.
>
> Or you can prepare a patch for -mm and ask Andrew to add it to the -mm
> tree.
>
Thanks for the tip,

>> Would you mind adding "patch 1/3" (export_symbol_gpl) to your
>> patch-set since it depends on the new function names in your patch?
>> If not, I can resend the patch on top of your changes to match the new
>> function names if you prefer to have this patch separate.
>
> I recommend it to be a part of your patchset.  The new function name
> (fault_create_debugfs_attr) is not likely to change for a time.  You can
> add Acked-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx>
>
Beside fault_create_debugfs_attr() the other function is should_fail.
I presume this name will be changed too, and start with the fault_?

Regards,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux