On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:36 PM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jul 13 2011, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
>> it seems this series got lost in time, at least patches 01, 02, 03,
>> 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 12 look like valid standalone fixes and
>> improvements to me, they don't touch other trees and still apply
>> cleanly, so would be good to have.
>
> Yeah. I didn't merge them because Tony still has unanswered comments on
> the OMAP side of the patches, and they're submitted as a single patchset.
>
> I've applied {2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12} to mmc-next for 3.1 now. 1 doesn't
> apply because the function doesn't exist anymore. 4 doesn't apply
> because iclk doesn't exist anymore.
>
> If someone wants to look at rebasing the rest of these against mmc-next
> and resubmitting, I think that'd be useful.
Thanks! 1 and 4 seem to be unneeded any more (I was trying them on
linux-next, not noticing it was not updated for a while), and others
have comments pending, so it's all done.
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Chris.
> --
> Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child
>
--
Gražvydas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
