> Sorry. I had some reason for moving esdhc_pltfm_get_ro around. We > can not keep the existing approach (what I said above). For mx51 > babbage example, esdhc1 uses internal WP while esdhc2 uses gpio WP. > If we have esdhc_pltfm_get_ro handle gpio only and assign it to > sdhci_esdhc_ops.get_ro in .probe only when wp_type is ESDHC_WP_GPIO, > that works for esdhc2 but breaks esdhc1 WP function. So no, I will > not change my code except adding NONE case handling there. Ok, fine with me. Thanks for checking! -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
