Hi Chris..
Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi Jaehoon,
>
> On Fri, May 06 2011, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> This patch added mmc_power_off after mmc_attach_sd()
>>
>> i found that didn't detect the second card insert.(using SDHCI)
>> you can see the below log.
>>
>> i want to know that somebody know this issue...
>>
>> ->first card inserted (correct card detect)
>> # mmc1: new SDHC card at address e624
>> mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU04G 3.69 GiB
>> mmcblk1: p1
>> #
>> # mmc1: card e624 removed
>> -> second card inserted
>> mmc1: error -110 whilst initialising SD card
>> mmc1: Card removed during transfer!
>> mmc1: Resetting controller.
>> -> third card inserted
>> mmc1: new SDHC card at address e624
>> mmcblk1: mmc1:e624 SU04G 3.69 GiB
>> mmcblk1: p1
>>
>> I added mmc_power_off() after only mmc_attach_sd().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> index 1dbc185..d5d8ac0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
>> @@ -1522,8 +1522,10 @@ static int mmc_rescan_try_freq(struct mmc_host *host, unsigned freq)
>> /* Order's important: probe SDIO, then SD, then MMC */
>> if (!mmc_attach_sdio(host))
>> return 0;
>> - if (!mmc_attach_sd(host))
>> + if (!mmc_attach_sd(host)) {
>> + mmc_power_off(host);
>> return 0;
>> + }
>> if (!mmc_attach_mmc(host))
>> return 0;
>>
>
> It looks to me like this patch says "if we successfully attach/power up
> an SD card, then power it back off again immediately". Why would that
> make sense?
It's non-sense...i know...How did you think about that problem..?
I want to get your advise...
>
> - Chris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
