Re: mmc blkqueue is empty even if there are pending reads in do_generic_file_read()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4 May 2011 21:13, Per Forlin <per.forlin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 3 May 2011 22:02, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 03 May 2011 20:54:43 Per Forlin wrote:
>>> >> page_not_up_to_date:
>>> >> /* Get exclusive access to the page ... */
>>> >> error = lock_page_killable(page);
>>> > I looked at the code in do_generic_file_read(). lock_page_killable
>>> > waits until the current read ahead is completed.
>>> > Is it possible to configure the read ahead to push multiple read
>>> > request to the block device queue?add
>>
>> I believe sleeping in __lock_page_killable is the best possible scenario.
>> Most cards I've seen work best when you use at least 64KB reads, so it will
>> be faster to wait there than to read smaller units.
>>
> Sleeping is ok but I don't wont the read execution to stop (mmc going
> to idle when there is actually more to read).
> I did an interesting discovery when I forced host mmc_req_size to 64k
> The reads now look like:
> dd if=/dev/mmcblk0 of=/dev/null bs=4k count=256
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f9b0 blocks 32
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f9b0 blocks 64
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f8d8 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f9b0 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f800 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f8d8 blocks 128
>  [do_generic_file_read] lock_page_killable-wait sec 0 nsec 7811230
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955fec0 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f800 blocks 128
>  [do_generic_file_read] lock_page_killable-wait sec 0 nsec 7811492
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d955f9b0 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967cd30 blocks 128
>  [do_generic_file_read] lock_page_killable-wait sec 0 nsec 7810848
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967cc58 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967cb80 blocks 128
>  [do_generic_file_read] lock_page_killable-wait sec 0 nsec 7810654
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967caa8 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c9d0 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c8f8 blocks 128
>  [do_generic_file_read] lock_page_killable-wait sec 0 nsec 7810652
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c820 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c748 blocks 128
>  [do_generic_file_read] lock_page_killable-wait sec 0 nsec 7810952
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c670 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c598 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c4c0 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req d967c3e8 blocks 128
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
>  [mmc_queue_thread] req   (null) blocks 0
> The mmc queue never runs empty until end of transfer.. The requests
> are 128 blocks (64k limit set in mmc host driver) compared to 256
> blocks before. This will not improve performance much since the
> transfer now are smaller than before. The latency is minimal but
> instead there extra number of transfer cause more mmc cmd overhead.
> I added prints to print the wait time in lock_page_killable too.
> I wonder if I can achieve a none empty mmc block queue without
> compromising the mmc host driver performance.
>
There is actually a performance increase from 16.5 MB/s to 18.4 MB/s
when lowering the max_req_size to 64k.
I run a dd test on a pandaboard using 2.6.39-rc5 kernel.

First case when block queue gets empty after every request:
root@(none):/ dd if=/dev/mmcblk0p3 of=/dev/null bs=4k count=25600
25600+0 records in
25600+0 records out
104857600 bytes (100.0MB) copied, 6.061107 seconds, 16.5MB/s

Second case when modifying omap_hsmmc to force request size is to half
(128 instead of 256). This results in queue is never empty
dd if=/dev/mmcblk0p3 of=/dev/null bs=4k count=25600
25600+0 records in
25600+0 records out
104857600 bytes (100.0MB) copied, 5.423362 seconds, 18.4MB/s

Regards,
Per
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux