Hi Wolfram, On Tue, Apr 26 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:50:31AM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: >> Hi Arindam, >> >> On Tue, Apr 26 2011, Nath, Arindam wrote: >> Yes, sounds good -- linux-mmc@ folks, would anyone like to give a >> Tested- or Reviewed-by: on these patches? > > Considering this is a rather large changeset (thanks for doing it!), > what about putting it into an extra -next round (i.e. for-2.6.41) unless > somebody reviews or tests the series? I sadly can't, no hardware. I agree we should do this if we don't get reviewers or testers, but I think we've already got several people testing this out -- I know prakity has been following it and building a patchset on top of it for eMMC, and we've had a huge number of review comments already. So, I expect we'll pick up Tested-by tags and can plan on submitting for .40 unless we start seeing regressions in mmc-next. Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
