> -----Original Message----- > From: Nath, Arindam [mailto:Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:56 AM > To: Subhash Jadavani; 'Andrei Warkentin'; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 01/12] mmc: sdhci: add support for auto CMD23 > > Hi Subhash, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Subhash Jadavani [mailto:subhashj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 11:47 AM > > To: 'Andrei Warkentin'; Nath, Arindam; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 01/12] mmc: sdhci: add support for auto CMD23 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: linux-mmc-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-mmc- > > > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Andrei Warkentin > > > Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2011 1:34 AM > > > To: Nath, Arindam; linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/12] mmc: sdhci: add support for auto > CMD23 > > > > > > +linux-mmc > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Andrei Warkentin > > > <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Andrei Warkentin > > > <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Hi Arindam, > > > >> > > > >> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Nath, Arindam > > > <Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >>> Hi Andrei, > > > >> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I've recently posted changes relating to CMD23 support in > block > > > layer. > > > >>>> Effectively, in order to support hosts with and without > > > >>>> Auto-CMD23 (and with proper error handling) there is a new > > > >>>> MMC_CAP_CMD23 for > > > the > > > >>>> host, and a new field "mmc_command sbc" inside the > mmc_request. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> I also have a patch enabling CMD23 use with an SDHCI host (< > > > 3.00). > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Could you be so kind as to rebase this patch on top of that? > > > You're > > > >>>> doing a lot of things here that you really shouldn't be (like > > > >>>> enforcing policy on what gets sent to cards, knowing what's > > > connected > > > >>>> to the host, conflicting with reliable writes code if Auto- > CMD23 > > > was > > > >>>> enabled for MMCs, not supporting MMCs which always have > > > >>>> SET_BLOCK_COUNT). > > > >>> > > > >>> Our Host Controller is complaint to the Host Controller Spec > > > >>> v3.00, > > > and since Auto CMD23 is a feature added to the HC, I thought it > would > > > be better to make this feature part of sdhci and not the core/block > > > layer. > > > >>> > > > >>> But in case you want Auto CMD23 to be implemented in a > different > > > way, it would rather be great if you help me implement in your own > > > way, and then probably based on community suggestions, we can keep > > > either of the patch. > > > >> > > > >> Let me clarify: > > > >> > > > >> 1) Sending CMD23 on multiblock transfers is not a an SDHCI > > specific > > > >> feature. It's a feature of MMC cards and SD cards operating at > > > UHS104 > > > >> or greater. > > > >> 2) CMD23-bounded multi block writes are a generic problem > already > > - > > > >> eMMC reliable writes, for example. > > > >> 3) CMD23 is not bound to any specific controller - so having > > > >> generic code to allow execution of CMD23 will speed up transfers > > > >> (and enable certain features) on any host. > > > > These are the same point I had discussed earlier with Arindam. Please > > check the attached mails. > > > > Yes, I would also agree with Andrei that all generic code related to > > CMD23 handling should be in core/block layer. Internally host > > controller driver can handle CMD23 differently as not all host > > controller support AUTO-CMD23. > > Please keep in mind that my patch _only_ adds support for Auto CMD23, > and not CMD23. CMD23 support can be made part of block layer, but Auto > CMD23 is a feature as per the Host Controller Spec v3.00. So my patch > takes care of the second case. Agreed. But point is that Host controller driver should not be sending CMD23 to card unless indicated by core/block layer to do so. In your patch you are checking in host controller driver that SD card supports CMD23 or not and then sending the CMD23 for multi block read/write. MMC cards also supports CMD23 so in that case again you have to check MMC EXT_CSD register for CMD23 support. All this logic is better be in core/block layer and let core/block layer inform host controller when to send CMD23 and when not to. > > Thanks, > Arindam > > > > > > >> 4) Auto-CMD is a specific SDHCI enhancement, meant to reduce > > > overhead > > > >> of sending CMD23. > > > >> 5) Host controller has to be aware of CMD23 sending, because on > an > > > >> error STOP has to be sent, and without error, no STOP has to be > > > sent. > > > >> > > > >> You are in a unique position where you have functional SDHCI 3.0 > > > >> hardware and are able to test Auto-CMD23. Please look at the > patch > > > set > > > >> I sent - it should be trivial to extend current SDHCI patch to > use > > > >> Auto-CMD23 when possible instead of sending mmc_request->sbc. > > > >> Basically, I have a generic improvement that affects all host > > > >> controllers. Auto-CMD23 is an optimization of that for SDHCI > 3.0. > > > >> > > > >> Your current patch to enable Auto-CMD23 is not useful as far as > > > >> non- > > > SD > > > >> cards are concerned and you push way to much policy and > > > >> non-host-related complexity into it. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> A > > > >> > > > > > > > > More clarification: > > > > > > > > The block layer patch may change slightly > > (whitelisting/blacklisting > > > > certain MMC devices for using CMD23 for multiblock transfers), > but > > > the > > > > changes to mmc_request and SDHCI are not. So feel free to rebase > it > > > > without waiting for anything. If you need help, I will gladly > help > > > > you, but keep in mind I don't have SDHCI 3.0 hardware around. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > A > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux- > mmc" > > > in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More > majordomo > > > info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
