On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 14 2011, Chris Ball wrote: > > Here's a sample disassembly of one function on ARM with gcc-4.6.0, and > > diff -y. Explicit memset (which calls __memzero) on the left, and {0} > > initializer (which calls memset) on the right: > > (I checked on x86_64 too, and the code's identical -- it's inlined into > a "rep stos %eax,%es:(%rdi)" either way.) Glad to know that gcc is not as dumb as it used to be. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html