Hi Wolfram, On Tue, Mar 15 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote: >> I'm leaning towards merging it as-is and then >> working on incremental fixes; please yell if that sounds like a bad idea. > > What about staging? From my all overall impression, the driver would fit there. > Also, there are more people lurking around fixing coding-style than here. I thought about it, but I think staging drivers generally have a much larger TODO list than this one would. Perhaps a good plan is: I'll push it to mmc-next after the 2.6.39 merge, then I'll try to work on style changes a bit (I'll send each patch to the list and Tony can ACK/NACK them), and then we can include it in 2.6.40 either as a normal driver if we're comfortable with how it's ended up, or as a staging driver if we'd still like to get some more eyes on it. Does that sound okay to everyone? Thanks, - Chris. -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
