Hi Chris On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Chris Ball wrote: > Hi Guennadi, > > On Fri, Mar 11 2011, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Currently kunmap_atomic() doesn't take into account the offset, used > > with kmap_atomic(). On platforms, where kunmap_atomic() is not a NOP, > > this will lead to problems, when offset != 0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> > > --- > > > > No, I've never seen this bug trigger, so, not sure whether we need it for > > .38 / stable. > > Thanks, I've pushed this to mmc-next for .39. > > Could I get your ACK on the sh/tmio patches in Linus W's "[PATCH 00/11] > MMC DMA-API/dmaengine fixups" patchset, please? Hm, I've looked at them briefly and nothing in them struck me in them, but if you want a formal reviewed-by or such I'll have to look at them in more detail. I'm away from tomorrow until Saturday at a V4L2 meeting, so, will have little time... I'll try to do that, but, will not be able to test them. So, either just a review this week or a review + test not before next weekend, sorry. Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
