> >> - return count; > >> + return 0xE; > > > > Why don't you remove the function entirely? > > better to rename it --- to set_maximum_timeout since a little clearer. > left the old name for historical reasons -- if no need I will change it I'd suggest... > > > > >> } > >> > >> static void sdhci_set_transfer_irqs(struct sdhci_host *host) > >> @@ -671,7 +633,7 @@ static void sdhci_prepare_data(struct sdhci_host *host, struct mmc_data *data) > >> host->data = data; > >> host->data_early = 0; > >> > >> - count = sdhci_calc_timeout(host, data); > >> + count = sdhci_calc_timeout(); > >> sdhci_writeb(host, count, SDHCI_TIMEOUT_CONTROL); using SDHCI_TIMEOUT_MAX here instead of count with a proper define in sdhci.h. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
