On Friday 18 February 2011, Andrei Warkentin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Andrei Warkentin <andreiw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Arnd, > > > > Yes, this is a Toshiba card. I've sent the patch as a reply to Linus' email. > > > > cid - 02010053454d3332479070cc51451d00 > > csd - d00f00320f5903ffffffffff92404000 > > erase_size - 524288 > > fwrev - 0x0 > > hwrev - 0x0 > > manfid - 0x000002 > > name - SEM32G > > oemid - 0x0100 > > preferred_erase_size - 2097152 > > > > Ok. Big mistake. Sorry about that. This card is Sandisk card. I got > confused over all the manfids changing. > > Here is the Toshiba card: > > cid - 1101004d4d4333324703101a17746d00 > csd - 900e00320f5903ffffffffe796400000 > erase_size - 524288 > fwrev - 0x0 > hwrev - 0x0 > manfid - 0x000011 > name - MMC32G > oemid - 0x0100 > preferred_erase_size - 4194304 > > I'll get you the flashbench timings for both. I'm curious. Neither the manfid nor the oemid fields of either card match what I have seen on SD cards, I would expect them to be Sandisk: manfid 0x000003, oemid 0x5344 Toshiba: manfid 0x000002, oemid 0x544d I have not actually seen any Toshiba SD cards, but I assume that they use the same controllers as Kingston. Does anyone know if the IDs have any correlation between MMC and SD controllers? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
