Hi Chris,
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:33:33AM +0000, Dmitry Shmidt wrote:
>> Recently new check was added to core.c function mmc_rescan():
>> if (host->bus_ops && host->bus_ops->detect && !host->bus_dead
>> && mmc_card_is_removable(host)) <<<< This one
>> host->bus_ops->detect(host);
>> mmc_card_is_removable() is checking
>> !(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) && mmc_assume_removable;
>>
>> If we use CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME then
>> mmc_assume_removable will be 0 and any card will be always considered
>> as non-removable. And host->bus_ops->detect() will not be called on card
>> removal.
>
> I agree that we've changed the behavior to avoid running ->detect
> in this case, but that was intentional -- you should not be using
> CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME on a card that is physically removable.
> Why are you trying to?
MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME is affecting mmc_sdio_resume() sequence. If it is
not defined then sdio card will be considered
"removable" and on resume mmc_sdio_init_card() will be always called.
static int mmc_sdio_resume(struct mmc_host *host)
{
...
if (mmc_card_is_removable(host) || !mmc_card_is_powered_resumed(host))
err = mmc_sdio_init_card(host, host->ocr, host->card,
(host->pm_flags & MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER));
>
> config MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME
> bool "Assume MMC/SD cards are non-removable (DANGEROUS)"
> ...
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/>
> One Laptop Per Child
>
Thanks,
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
