On Saturday 12 February 2011 19:37:27 Shawn Guo wrote: > > If you use a flattened device tree, you can avoid the need for > > platform data by adding the phandle of the dma engine device to > > a property of the mmc driver, along with the channel number inside > > of that device. I think that would be the cleanest approach, but > > some people still need to be convinced that changing drivers to > > use fdt data is the right direction for ARM. > > > Could we keep the current the approach for now and go to the cleanest > way directly when Grant's dt patches get merged? Sounds good to me. If you are planning to use device trees anyway, I don't have a problem with leaving it your way in the meantime. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
