Hi Will I'm probing dw_mmc on Samsung SoC... So i have some board specific data.. But i didn't want to add board specific data in dw_mmc.c I want to use get_cd()/get_wd()/init()...So i asked to you..:) If i need not the data information, i will not append them.. you're right, maybe "struct dw_mci" need not..(just example) And i think that need card_detect irq-handler function..if we use pdata->init..isn't? :) In future, if i need your help, can i ask to you? Onemore...Did you test the dw_mmc..? If you can answer, i want to know the performance.. Will Newton wrote: > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Will.. >> >> I need your help for your code.. >> >> In dw_mmc.h, exist some function pointer.. >> >> int *get_ro(u32 slot_id); >> int *get_cd(u32 slot_id); >> ... >> >> Just only need slot_id?? >> If i need the "struct dw_mci", could i append the parameter? > > Yes, that should be possible. However I would like to reduce the > number of places the whole struct dw_mci > is passed around if possible, as the whole struct is usually not > needed and it exposes some driver internals. > > Which part of struct dw_mci do you need in the callback? > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
