Tony, On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Kishore Kadiyala <kishore.kadiyala@xxxxxx> [110118 09:19]: >> This patch series adds support for ADMA on MMC1 & MMC2 controllers on OMAP4. >> There is no performance improvement observed using ADMA over SDMA. >> Advantage using ADMA could be reducing contention over SDMA. >> Also the series includes some cleanup. > > To me it seems that the only sane way to deal with multiple different > DMA enginges is to implement them all with drivers/dma/dmaengine.c. > Otherwise we'll end up with multiple custom ADMA implementations in > each driver. We need to also make SDMA use the dmaengine code. > > If the current dmaengine code does not support this, we need to > improve it to deal with cases like these. Ok, I will check the feasibility of implementing ADMA through dmaengine . -- Regards, Kishore > > Regards, > > Tony > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
