On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 12:45:14AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 10:10:19AM +0000, Pawel Moll wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2011 07:50:42 +0900, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/Makefile | 8 + > > >>> Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/vrl4.c | 169 > > >>+++++++++++++++++++++ > > >>How about putting those two into "tools" (in particular "tools/arm") > > >>instead of "Documentation"? > > >>Just a thought... ;-) > > > > > >Thats fine by me except that tools/arm doesn't exist yet. > > >It would be good to get some consensus before creating it. > > > > I think there is consensus regarding "tools" as a place for user-space > > tools - eg. perf tools used to live in "Documentation/..." and then were > > moved to "tools/perf". > > > > Now, whether your stuff should be in "tools/SH-Mobile" or > > "tools/arm/SH-Mobile", I have no opinion ;-) > > > I agree that this is a worthwhile direction to move to, but we're a long > way from a consensus. x86 has traditionally littered scripts/ and others > have sunk to arch/<foo>/tools hostprogs abuse and so forth. perf is a bit > of a special case in that it's fairly architecture agnostic. I would prefer to leave the code in Documentation/arm/SH-Mobile/ as it complements the document that is in the same directory - weather its more code or documentation is debatable IMHO. I'm happy to move things later if a consensus is reached. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
