On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 02:43:07AM -0600, Olof Johansson wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 09:35:46AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Can't you just use sdhci-pltfm? > > Not if I want to hide some of the SoC-specific errata with driver-local > workarounds instead of polluting the global quirk namespace with them. > > Otherwise, yeah, it'd be a good candidate for it. Hm, on second look, it seems as if the -pltfm can take the ops structure from the platform data. Still, I don't see the point -- the amount of code would be about the same between wrapping it with a coat of workarounds and op structures, gpio setup, etc, and just doing a separate simple driver. The code shared is really just the resource allocation pieces. -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
