Re: can we remove the quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Doesn't the platform data hold the specific board specific quirks ?

Can you provide an example of how you see the platform data being used.  I think we are saying the same thing using different words but a code snippet would clarify this.

Philip

On Nov 9, 2010, at 3:55 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 03:45:15AM -0800, Philip Rakity wrote:
>> 
>> reposting since we are discussing removing quirks.   
>> 
>> We could partition the quirks into one set for controller quirks and one set for platform quirks.  That would give us another 32 quirks. 
> 
> IMHO we need less quirks, not more. Adding the number of potential
> quirks just delays the underlying problem. Also, unless someone
> enlightens me, I don't think there are platform quirks, only
> platform_data?
> 
> Regards,
> 
>   Wolfram
> 
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux