Re: [RFC] MMC: Proposals on reworking clock and power management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2. Ideally host-driver driver should not tell the core to shut down
>>    the upper layers, instead the core should decide when to
>>    "disabled clock or cut the power".
>
> How will the core know ?
>
> I actually think you are simply perpetuating the mess in the existing MMC
> driver where everything is driven by a core which as a result is a twisty
> maze of exceptions and flags to say "except for this" "except for that".
>
> The core MMC code only knows when the *core* parts are no longer
> requiring power. It shouldn't know about anything deeper and if you are
> using the runtime PM layer the runtime PM refcounting can do all your
> work.

Agree Alan,
Its better adapting the driver to Runtime PM instead fixing some thing
in the core.

Regards,
Kishore

>
> Alan
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux