Hi, On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 03:13:02PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 08:32:46AM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote: > > Update with comments from Matt and Eric. > > Test with sd and emmc. > > > > >From e5dd554ed4d3488a83d9a4888d68d1d85482f747 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 10:51:28 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] mmc: add support of sdhci-pxa driver > > > > Support Marvell PXA168/PXA910/MMP2 SD Host Controller > > > > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h | 32 ++++ > > drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 12 ++ > > drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c | 259 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 4 files changed, 304 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-pxa/include/plat/sdhci.h > > create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxa.c > > I'll take the drivers/mmc/ hunks, but you should send the plat-pxa/ > patch through the ARM tree. Oh. If we do that then the driver won't compile until everything's together, because it #includes <plat/sdhci.h>. Haojian/Eric, what do you prefer here? Should I take the arch/arm/ hunk via the MMC tree? (If so, please provide ACKs.) Thanks, -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
