Hi Philip, On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:27:12PM -0700, Philip Rakity wrote: > This code has not been tested on mmc-test but has been patched against. I have run it against 2.6.32 (with some minor changes). > > I wanted to give folks a chance to comment before making it a formal patch. The code add the hooks into the sdhci layer for > version 3.0 of the controller, including mmc/eMMC dual data rate support (ddr). The next RFC adds support for DDR at the mmc layer This doesn't apply against mmc-next, in part because it duplicates code from Zhangfei's SDHC 3.0 patches in mmc-next here: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=90ce6eed919bf30fa545bbe93265bc6c463cedda http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=07f1a246a56b12fe85897580cc696160f41e3983 http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/cjb/mmc.git;a=commit;h=0bd7f9f081e9131d4d724f3a3bd19a500c10a5e3 and from Hanumath's DDR 4.4 patch, and Adrian's additions to it, which I haven't merged into -next yet but plan to soon -- I've been waiting for more feedback on them. They already add DDR support at the MMC layer: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/177312/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/177332/ If you could study these and rebase your patch on top of all of them, it would help us see what you're changing. Thanks, -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
