Re: [patch 1/3] sdhci-pltfm: add call back alloc_host

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:08:27AM -0400, zhangfei gao wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:55 PM, zhangfei gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From 7a870a620fa868ed4ce0cffcbd6b0683a00ae2e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:30:01 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/3] sdhci-pltfm: add call back alloc_host
> >
> >        alloc_host could alloc specific structure of device to meet different
> > requirement
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c |    4 ++--
> >  include/linux/sdhci-pltfm.h    |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> > index 9669f21..82d3d05 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pltfm.c
> > @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ static int __devinit sdhci_pltfm_probe(struct
> > platform_device *pdev)
> >                dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Invalid iomem size. You may "
> >                        "experience problems.\n");
> >
> > -       if (pdev->dev.parent)
> > -               host = sdhci_alloc_host(pdev->dev.parent, 0);
> > +       if (pdata && pdata->alloc_host)
> > +               host = pdata->alloc_host(&pdev->dev);
> >        else
> >                host = sdhci_alloc_host(&pdev->dev, 0);
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sdhci-pltfm.h b/include/linux/sdhci-pltfm.h
> > index e14fce3..80c415e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sdhci-pltfm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sdhci-pltfm.h
> > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ struct sdhci_pltfm_data {
> >        unsigned int quirks;
> >        int (*init)(struct sdhci_host *host, struct sdhci_pltfm_data *pdata,
> > void* priv_pdata);
> >        void (*exit)(struct sdhci_host *host);
> > +       struct sdhci_host *(*alloc_host)(struct device *dev);
> >  };
> >
> >  #endif /* _SDHCI_PLTFM_H */
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
> >
> 
> Any feed back, much thanks.

I had this in mind when creating the patch which added the
host-structure. But I came to the same conclusion as Anton that it seems
overengineered at this point. How much private data would you need?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux