On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:02:08AM +0530, Ghorai, Sukumar wrote: > Would you please review and merge this patch [1] (attached too)? > [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/2714 I've been following the thread. I believe Adrian has NACKed this patch, by saying "It is absolutely unacceptable to return I/O errors to the upper layers for segments that do not have errors." I think it's possible to merge patches to improve the situation (such as the idea of noticing a card disappearing earlier), but your initial patch is not the patch to do that. You should continue to work with Adrian -- when he's happy that a patch does not break the semantics above, we can consider merging it. Thanks, -- Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/> One Laptop Per Child -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
