Re: [PATCH 3/3] MMC/SD: add callback function to detect card

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adrian Hunter wrote:
Matt Fleming wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 08:05:13PM +0100, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:55:09PM +0800, r66093@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Add callback function to check if the card has been removed.

in order to check if the card has been removed, the function mmc_send_status will send commad CMD13 to card and ask the card to send its status register to driver, which will generate interrupt repeatly and make the system bad.
Therefore, get_cd callback is used to detect the card if the driver has.

Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang <Chang-Ming.Huang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c |    5 ++++-
 drivers/mmc/core/sd.c  |    5 ++++-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
index 06084db..c5c676d 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/mmc.c
@@ -494,7 +494,10 @@ static void mmc_detect(struct mmc_host *host)
 	/*
 	 * Just check if our card has been removed.
 	 */
-	err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
+	if (host->ops->get_cd)
+		err = !host->ops->get_cd(host);
+	else
+		err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
mmc_release_host(host); diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
index cd81c39..3cf1f38 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
@@ -548,7 +548,10 @@ static void mmc_sd_detect(struct mmc_host *host)
 	/*
 	 * Just check if our card has been removed.
 	 */
-	err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
+	if (host->ops->get_cd)
+		err = !host->ops->get_cd(host);
+	else
+		err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);
mmc_release_host(host); --
1.6.4
This patchset wasn't replied to -- any comments on it from the list?
I think this change makes sense, although it needs to be a bit smarter
with error handling because the get_cd() functions can return -ENOSYS if
they are not implemented (but the function pointer is still valid).

	int err = 0;

	if (host->ops->get_cd) {
		err = host->ops->get_cd(host);
		if (err >= 0)
			err = !err;
	}

	if (!host->ops->get_cd || err < 0)
		err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);

Thoughts?

I am not sure it won't cause problems.

If you change the card then card detect will return true because
there is a card but send status will fail because the card is not
initialised.  So the two do not seem equivalent.

But maybe the following?

	int err = 0;

	if (host->ops->get_cd)
		err = !host->ops->get_cd(host);

	if (!err)
		err = mmc_send_status(host->card, NULL);




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux