Hi Kyungmin,
> It's already patched. you can find it easily at list.
I think you're talking about this patch from Zhangfei:
From: Zhangfei Gao <zgao6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:15:32 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] sdhci: support MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED
Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zgao6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 7855121..913555e 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1823,7 +1823,7 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
if (caps & SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD)
- mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED;
+ mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED;
if (host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL;
--
But this patch wasn't sent to Andrew either -- and so isn't in Linus'
or Andrew's tree -- and it's also only one of the two hunks in George's
earlier patch. George also had:
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -1180,7 +1180,8 @@ static void sdhci_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
else
ctrl &= ~SDHCI_CTRL_4BITBUS;
- if (ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS &&
+ if ((ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_SD_HS ||
+ ios->timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS) &&
!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT))
ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_HISPD;
else
So, we still have to send a patch to Andrew, and decide which patch it
should be. What do you think?
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@xxxxxxxxxx> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
