On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:48:29 +0100 Matt Fleming <matt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 06:37:45PM -0400, Chris Ball wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > Hm is there some problem with this patch or has the processing of > > > it simply stalled? When I read the thread I cannot see Hanumaths > > > answers on the list but it looks mainly like the patch is OK and > > > there is some chit-chat. > > > > > > Can it be picked up? Everyone is going to need DDR MMC for their > > > eMMCs soon-ish. > > > > I'd like to dedicate more time to mmc/. Do you think it'd be useful > > for me to catch all the patches sent to linux-mmc@ into a public Git > > tree, and periodically report on what went upstream via akpm and > > what's still waiting? > > It's possible Andrew has a reason that hasn't been picked up yet. > Kyungmin Park's questions didn't seem adequately answered and the discussion kind of died. I updated the patch and merged it, but I'd like the outstanding question(s) resolved. ie: why do we add MMC_DDR_MODE, set it in brq.data.flags and then never use it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
