On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:44:23 +0300 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >From b25b9a499f255ee5999c219525d82ef40382318c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 15:41:38 +0300 > Subject: [PATCH 4/5] block: Add secure discard > > Secure discard is the same as discard except that all copies > of the discarded sectors (perhaps created by garbage collection) > must also be erased. That's not an awfully informative changelog. >From a quick peek at the code it seems that you took your earlier design sketch: On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 02:10:06PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > Needs a bio flag, a request flag, setup the request flag based on the > bio flag, prevent merging secure and non-secure discards, prevent drivers > doing non-secure discards for secure discards. > > Seems like a lot of little changes for something that no one wants. > Shouldn't it wait for someone to need it first? and changed your mind and implemented it. Is that a correct interpretation? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
