Re: [PATCH 0/3] tmio: let platforms decide upon write-protection availability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 04:33:33PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:38:27PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 19 May 2010 20:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
> > Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > No changes to patches themselves, just re-sending with an ack added.
> > > 
> > > Applies on top of the
> > > 
> > > "[PATCH 0/10] add DMA support to tmio_mmc, using dmaengine API, use it on SH"
> > > 
> > > patch series.
> > > 
> > 
> > Paul, are you planning on merging the tem patches in the
> > above-mentioned series for 2.6.35-rc1?
> > 
> Yes, they'll be in my next round of updates for -rc1. Since I don't have
> much else, I'll send those out today or tomorrow.

Since the 0/3 and 0/2 series also had all of the acked-bys and so on I
also took those. This at least lets us merge all of the sh platform
patches at the same time without any odd dependency ordering. The ARM
stuff I'll take care of separately after these have been merged.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux