Re: [PATCH 2/8] SH: add DMA slave IDs for two SDHI controllers, add slaves to sh7722

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Magnus Damm wrote:

> Hi Guennadi,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > SuperH SDHI controllers can use DMA, add slave IDs to the header and slave
> > definitions to sh7722.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/sh/include/asm/dmaengine.h        |    4 ++++
> >  arch/sh/kernel/cpu/sh4a/setup-sh7722.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/sh/include/asm/dmaengine.h b/arch/sh/include/asm/dmaengine.h
> > index 2a02b61..876e601 100644
> > --- a/arch/sh/include/asm/dmaengine.h
> > +++ b/arch/sh/include/asm/dmaengine.h
> > @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ enum {
> >        SHDMA_SLAVE_SIUA_RX,
> >        SHDMA_SLAVE_SIUB_TX,
> >        SHDMA_SLAVE_SIUB_RX,
> > +       SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_RX,
> > +       SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI0_TX,
> > +       SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI1_RX,
> > +       SHDMA_SLAVE_SDHI1_TX,
> >  };
> >
> >  #endif
> 
> Thanks for your work on this. Two SDHIs may be enough for most
> processor types, but I think the G3 processor actually has three. With
> that in mind, I think it makes more sense to keep the slave ids
> together with the processor specific bits in for instance
> arch/sh/include/cpu-sh4/cpu/sh7722.h.
> 
> If you have time, can you please make a patch that moves the slave ids
> into the processor specific header files? This on top of the other
> code in the sh/dmaengine topic branch.

Ok, yes, first, I forgot to mention - this patch series is based on your 
earlier SH dmaengine patches. Secondly - sure, we can move these defines 
in cpu-specific headers, otoh - why? This is just an enum, it doesn't take 
space in binaries, and having them all together helps uniformity and 
avoids duplication, I think. So, I would just add those SDHI2 macros to 
this list. The important thing is, the actual slave definition array are 
per-CPU. Which is now the case after your patch series.

> With that in place it will be easy to extend each processor type by
> itself without having to tie in dependencies on a single asm file.

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux