On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:11:00PM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 07:55:30PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote: > > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > > Some hosts (e.g. as found in CNS3xxx SOCs) report wrong value in > > > CLOCK_BASE capability field, and currently there is no way to > > > force the SDHCI core to use the platform-provided base clock value. > > > > I don't think this needs a new quirk. Change the sdhci driver to check > > if the platform provides a value before reading the standard register. > > Well, Pierre once said that by default we should conform to the > SDHCI spec, and any diviations from the spec should be handled by > the quirks: > > http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Kernel/2009-02/msg03385.html > > Spec clearly states that base clock == 0 is the case when we should > fall back to the platform-provided clocks. No further comments, resending the patches... Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
