On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 03:48:17PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> We need a way to pass controller specific information to the
>> SPI device driver. For that purpose a new header is made.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jassi Brar <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/include/plat/spi.h | 68 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/include/plat/spi.h
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/include/plat/spi.h b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/include/plat/spi.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..d65ddfd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/include/plat/spi.h
>
> let's not have all these called spi.h, it will make life more difficult
> when trying to find which spi.h we are searching for in our platform
> support.
We can call it s3c64xx-spi.h but won't that be kinda redundant as it's
in plat-s3c64xx ?
>> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
>> +/* linux/arch/arm/plat-s3c64xx/include/plat/spi.h
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2009 Samsung Electronics Ltd.
>> + * Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#ifndef __S3C64XX_PLAT_SPI_H
>> +#define __S3C64XX_PLAT_SPI_H __FILE__
>> +
>> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_SRCCLK_PCLK 0
>> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_SRCCLK_SPIBUS 1
>> +#define S3C64XX_SPI_SRCCLK_48M 2
>> +
>> +#define BUSNUM(b) (b)
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo - ChipSelect description
>> + * @fb_delay: Slave specific feedback delay.
>> + * @set_level: CS line control.
>> + */
>> +struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo {
>> + u8 fb_delay;
>> + void (*set_level)(int lvl);
>> +};
>
> I think set_level should be called 'set_cs' to make it clearer what is
> being done here.
Well, in the driver we instantiate the structure pointer as 'cs', so all
the calls look like "cs->set_level" so I think that should be ok,
as it's quite obvious its all about cs(ChipSelect).
>> +/**
>> + * struct s3c64xx_spi_cntrlr_info - SPI Controller defining structure
>> + * @src_clk_nr: Clock source index for the CLK_CFG[SPI_CLKSEL] field.
>> + * @src_clk_name: Platform name of the corresponding clock.
>> + * @src_clk: Pointer to the source clock.
>> + * @num_cs: Number of CS this controller emulates.
>> + * @cs: Array describing each CS.
>> + * @cfg_gpio: Configure pins for this SPI controller.
>> + * @fifo_lvl_mask: All tx fifo_lvl fields start at offset-6
>> + * @rx_lvl_offset: Depends on tx fifo_lvl field and bus number
>> + * @high_speed: If the controller supports HIGH_SPEED_EN bit
>> + */
>> +struct s3c64xx_spi_cntrlr_info {
>
> how about not bothering with the _cntrlr_ here and just call it
> s3c64xx_spi_info instead?
Sure.
>> + int src_clk_nr;
>> + char *src_clk_name;
>> + struct clk *src_clk;
>
> do not pass 'struct clk *' in via platform data.
Since this is not initialized in platform code: just a pointer
made available to the driver. So, yes, this can be made a
member of s3c64xx_spi_driver_data rather.
>> + int num_cs;
>> + struct s3c64xx_spi_csinfo *cs;
>> +
>> + int (*cfg_gpio)(struct platform_device *pdev);
>> +
>> + /* Following two fields are for future compatibility */
>> + int fifo_lvl_mask;
>> + int rx_lvl_offset;
>> + int high_speed;
>> +};
>
> I was wondering if a single 'set_cs' callback here would be in order,
> given each spi device can already hold a chip-select number for use
> with such callbacks, so:
>
> void (*set_cs)(struct s3c64xx_spi_cntrlr_info *us, struct spi_device *sel, int to);
In that case the machine code wud have to map the chipselect number to
appropriate function/switch-case. Switch-case maybe ok, but calling some
function to toggle CS might result in bigger lags between CS and appearance
of clock on the bus.
>> +/**
>> + * s3c64xx_spi_set_info - SPI Controller configure callback by the board
>> + * initialization code.
>> + * @cntrlr: SPI controller number the configuration is for.
>> + * @src_clk_nr: Clock the SPI controller is to use to generate SPI clocks.
>> + * @cs: Pointer to the array of CS descriptions.
>> + * @num_cs: Number of elements in the 'cs' array.
>> + */
>> +extern void s3c64xx_spi_set_info(int cntrlr, int src_clk_nr, int num_cs);
>> +
>> +#endif /* __S3C64XX_PLAT_SPI_H */
>> --
>> 1.6.2.5
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
> --
> --
> Ben
>
> Q: What's a light-year?
> A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
