On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:11:43PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:52:54 +0100 > Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think it was Ben that suggested once to introduce a HAVE_SDHCI_S3C > symbol, selected by interested parties (S3C, S5P, S5PC...). Yes, I did mention this and it is an option to either replace the patch now or to do at a later date to tidy things up. I'm not going to reject this patch now (or force a rewrite at this late stage) I'll try and look at acking the last set of SDHCI patches Thomas sent and see if akpm will pick them up for linux-mmc. > Given the way Samsung SoCs are assembled (from an IP point of view), it > would make sense for one SoC to describe its features in > "HAVE_FEATURE_FOO" terms rather than each subsystem depending an ever > growing list of SoC. Yes, I was feeling that this is something that we should probably discuss either on linux-arm-kernel or to a wide audience. It might not suit everyone's taste, etc. -- Ben Q: What's a light-year? A: One-third less calories than a regular year. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
