David Vrabel wrote: > David Vrabel wrote: >> It's harmless if the tuple contains fewer so I think we should just try >> and parse as many strings as possible. Does this patch fix your regression? > > I spelt the field name wrong in the comment. Use this patch instead, > please. Works for me, so Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxx> I guess it's just a question of posting it as a normal patch and seeing if anyone screams. Thanks, Jonathan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
