On Mon 2009-09-14 22:05:10, Pierre Ossman wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 23:51:17 +0200 > Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Fri 2009-09-11 23:45:01, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > > > > Well system could check basic card ids if they match after resume - if > > > some users wants to crash his card by randomly swapping it during > > > suspend/resume - I'd have no problem with that.... > > > > Well, I do have small problem with that :-). > > > > Anyway, patch for rechecking IDs would probably be accepted, but > > that's not how it works now. > > It _does_ check the card id when you have UNSAFE_RESUME selected. It > doesn't just hook up whatever card you happen to have in the slot with > your old block device. I may have a lot of opponents when it comes > to my suspend design choices, but I'm not completely crazy. ;) :-) Ok, ok. Patch checking filesystem timestamps would be welcome in that case ;-). Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
