Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 15:00:03 +0300
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>From baf6574a1b5e7c4fdc4a66d9e038efeee75ea1a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 19:27:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] omap_hsmmc: ensure all clock enables and disables are paired
This patch hasn't been updated with
omap_hsmmc-ensure-all-clock-enables-and-disables-are-paired-fix-for-the-db-clock-failure-message.patch,
and
omap_hsmmc-ensure-all-clock-enables-and-disables-are-paired-fix-for-the-db-clock-failure-message.patch
is not present in the v3 patchset. What's up with that?
I am not sure what you want here. madhu's patch should apply cleanly on top of the ones I sent.
I went through the patchset seeing what you'd done.
mmc-add-host-capabilities-for-sd-only-and-mmc-only.patch and
omap_hsmmc-pass-host-capabilities-for-sd-only-and-mmc-only.patch were
dropped.
arm-omap-rx51-set-mmc-capabilities-and-power-saving-flag.patch was
significantly altered (I queued a delta for that).
omap_hsmmc-make-use-of-new-mmc_cap_nonremovable-host-capability.patch
was changed a bit to fix rejects (I think).
Yes that is right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
