On Thu, 7 Jan 2016, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The slub_debug=P not only poisons it enables other consistency checks on the
> slab as well, assuming my understanding of what check_object does is correct.
> My hope was to have the poison part only and none of the consistency checks in
> an attempt to mitigate performance issues. I misunderstood when the checks
> actually run and how SLUB_DEBUG was used.
Ok I see that there pointer check is done without checking the
corresponding debug flag. Patch attached thar fixes it.
> Another option would be to have a flag like SLAB_NO_SANITY_CHECK.
> sanitization enablement would just be that and SLAB_POISON
> in the debug options. The disadvantage to this approach would be losing
> the sanitization for ->ctor caches (the grsecurity version works around this
> by re-initializing with ->ctor, I haven't heard any feedback if this actually
> acceptable) and not having some of the fast paths enabled
> (assuming I'm understanding the code path correctly.) which would also
> be a performance penalty
I think we simply need to fix the missing check there. There is already a
flag SLAB_DEBUG_FREE for the pointer checks.
Subject: slub: Only perform pointer checks in check_object when SLAB_DEBUG_FREE is set
Seems that check_object() always checks for pointer issues currently.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
Index: linux/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slub.c
+++ linux/mm/slub.c
@@ -848,6 +848,9 @@ static int check_object(struct kmem_cach
*/
return 1;
+ if (!(s->flags & SLAB_DEBUG_FREE))
+ return 1;
+
/* Check free pointer validity */
if (!check_valid_pointer(s, page, get_freepointer(s, p))) {
object_err(s, page, p, "Freepointer corrupt");
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>