Michal Hocko wrote:
> @@ -333,6 +333,14 @@ static struct task_struct *select_bad_process(struct oom_control *oc,
> if (points == chosen_points && thread_group_leader(chosen))
> continue;
>
> + /*
> + * If the current major task is already ooom killed and this
> + * is sysrq+f request then we rather choose somebody else
> + * because the current oom victim might be stuck.
> + */
> + if (is_sysrq_oom(sc) && test_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_MEMDIE))
> + continue;
> +
> chosen = p;
> chosen_points = points;
> }
Do we want to require SysRq-f for each thread in a process?
If g has 1024 p, dump_tasks() will do
pr_info("[%5d] %5d %5d %8lu %8lu %7ld %7ld %8lu %5hd %s\n",
for 1024 times? I think one SysRq-f per one process is sufficient.
How can we guarantee that find_lock_task_mm() from oom_kill_process()
chooses !TIF_MEMDIE thread when try_to_sacrifice_child() somehow chose
!TIF_MEMDIE thread? I think choosing !TIF_MEMDIE thread at
find_lock_task_mm() is the simplest way.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>