On Tue 29-12-15 23:46:29, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > As far as I can see we explicitly munlock pages everywhere before unmap > them. The only case when we don't to that is OOM-reaper. Very well spotted! > I don't think we should bother with munlocking in this case, we can just > skip the locked VMA. Why cannot we simply munlock them here for the private mappings? diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 4b0a5d8b92e1..25dd7cd6fb5e 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -456,9 +456,12 @@ static bool __oom_reap_vmas(struct mm_struct *mm) * we do not want to block exit_mmap by keeping mm ref * count elevated without a good reason. */ - if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) + if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) { + if (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) + munlock_vma_pages_all(vma); unmap_page_range(&tlb, vma, vma->vm_start, vma->vm_end, &details); + } } tlb_finish_mmu(&tlb, 0, -1); up_read(&mm->mmap_sem); -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx"> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>